Constitutional Medicine: Origins & Adaptations

Our external lives have transformed in recent times, however internally, biologically, we remain much the same as we have for many thousands of generations. However differently we might dress, travel, communicate and relate we remain entirely human!

One of our most important characteristics as humans is our natural curiosity, even if it has got us into a lot of trouble! That curiosity has led us to closely study the world around us and nothing has fascinated us more than each other! Long ago, people noticed fundamental differences between each other that they described in various ways in different cultures but are well represented by words such as hotter, cooler, dryer or damper. It is the differences in these key qualities make up a person's constitution.

What follows is a brief personal account of my own journey into the origins of constitutional medicine and why I adapted this ancient knowledge for anyone in the modern world that could still use the help!

Our Pages

- Herbal Medicine
- The Clinic
- Richard Whelan

- Alphabetically

- By Group
- Alphabetical

- Clinic Hours
Clinic Location

- Ancient wisdom in the modern world


From Ancient Greece to Wild Africa

The written roots of Chinese and Ayurvedic medicine go back at least 5 thousand years and we can confidently assume an oral tradition that was passed down for a great many generations before that.

Similarly, the roots of what we could call Western herbalism come from European, Arabic, African and Native American cultures and those roots go as deep as people have needed Nature for everything - including their medicine!

One period of history, that of the Ancient Greeks, was an extra-ordinary time of free thinking and fast advances - this era gave us democracy, trial by jury, theatre's comedy & tragedy, combat by games rather than war (the Olympics), and numerous revelations in mathematics, architecture, philosophy etc.

In this time the Greeks also developed and wrote about the humoral system whereby they divided humanity into four groups that they described as Sanguine, Choleric, Phlegmatic & Melancholic. Each one of these groups was understood to have different characteristics, tendencies and temperaments and each was understood to have foods and medicines that would suit one type better than another.


I found this ancient knowledge remarkably useful to work with but I grew to see a fault in it that was too serious to be ignored. Initially it showed itself in the very negative connotations to the word 'Melancholic' and the somewhat negative connotations to the words 'Choleric' & 'Phlegmatic'. As I delved more deeply, I saw that the Greeks viewed the constitutional types with frank inequality.

As much as it truly was an age of enlightenment, the culture of the Ancient Greeks was still entrenched in hierarchical thinking. For example, their world-view embraced and endorsed slavery, only rich landowners could vote and women were seen as entirely inferior to men.

Hierarchical thinking permeated their view of the constitutions too. Sanguines were emphatically placed at the top, followed by cholerics, phlegmatics and then lowly melancholics.

2500 years later, growing up in the first country in the world to give women the vote, this old way of thinking about people but even more disturbing was how it just didn't reflect my own observations in the reality of day to day life in a busy health practice. It was abundantly clear to me that it was not actually better to be hotter, cooler, dryer or damper, it was simply different.

It was what people did with their inherent nature that determined their levels of health and happiness, not which constitution they belonged to.

Especially because of what started to feel to me like an m-word, things came to a kind of crisis point one day when I realised I could not keep using the old terminology without breaking the first rule of 'do no harm'.

I wanted to keep the humoral system's insight into people's core constitutional differences. I also wanted to be able to use a language to usefully communicate these ideas to others but if I was to drop the old names with their associated baggage then what would I replace them with?


The herbal tradition I first studied was called 'Physiomedicalism'. This is based on two great traditions, the old European ways along with the lore and practice of the medicine of the Native Americans.

Tribal medicine in particular has reverence for ways of relating to the primal forces of Nature through animal totems and so, many summers ago, I went on a personal ''vision-quest' to seek inspiration for the right symbols to represent these old names and ideas in a way that would not do harm or reinforce outmoded stereotypes but instead help people to understand the strengths and vulnerabilities of their constitutional nature with an open mind.

This began an extraordinary process whereby, over the days that followed and one at a time the exactly right totems came to me in a way that is hard to describe but was wonderful to experience.

First came the Tiger for people who were comparatively hotter and damper, then the Bear for people who were cooler and damper, then the Eagle for those who were hotter and dryer then finally the enigmatic Elephant/Butterfly for those who were cooler and dryer.

As each totem came into my mind as if placed there by some mysterious intelligence, it bought many realisations flooding in at the same time. All the experiences I'd gathered from working closely with thousands of patients suddenly took a cohesive shape that filled me with a new understanding.

Best of all I saw, with great joy, how we truly are not better or worse than one another, not at all, -- we are simply different, and I saw how these innate qualities of heat, damp, dryness and coolness each provided their own essential elements of balance and strength to the life force that animates us all.


Putting People First

I am what you could call a Western herbalist and there are two other main types of herbalists from the East, namely Chinese (TCM) and Indian (Ayurvedic) practitioners. Soon after I started practice in Christchurch in the late 1980s it struck me rather hard that, when I looked at these two great systems, that they retained an extraordinary wealth of tradition and philosophy that underpinned their work whereas my own system, by contrast, could be seen to be largely ignoring its own ancestral roots in favour of embracing a more modern, scientifically acceptable approach.

I could see then, and still do now, that there is great strength and vigour in the new world of evidence- based medicine but, at the same time, it has a reductionist approach to understanding people that can lack much necessary depth when it comes to that most remarkably multi-layered thing - a human being!

You simply cannot reduce a person to their problems alone. As tempting as it may be to give someone a label, and then simply focus on that, the truth is that whatever problems are happening are always part of a complex 'soup' that includes such things as nutrition, environment, work, relationships, outlook on life, feelings about themselves, their family, their culture... their everything!

Conventional medicine focuses on the illness and gives drugs to reduce its symptoms and sometimes this is entirely appropriate, especially when the suffering is overwhelming, however for many people, especially if they have been unwell for a long time, focusing on the illness in the way of 'how to get rid of it?' can just end up making it stronger because you must treat the cause of a chronic problem for it to be resolved.

I was personally compelled to dig up the old roots of my herbal traditions because they gave me a practical method and language to not get just get caught in trying to find the nearest exit from the overwhelming urgency of the symptoms but rather to keep seeing and working with the whole person.

The old ways of healing are still right about many things, including that you firstly must understand who a person is and where they have come from before you can help them find their way ahead. This approach gives the self-healing intelligence inside us the best kind of support to overcome our troubles.

In any case, history, philosophy and ideals aside, all that frankly matters to me in my day to day work is getting great results with people who have become stuck with problems they can't fix by themselves. In that respect, I have found the constitutional approach, putting people first, to be nothing short of transformative. It works, so I keep using it, and want to share it too...


~ Tigers: Hotter & Damper

~ Eagles: Hotter & Dryer

~ Elephant/Butterfly: Cooler & Dryer

~ Bears: Cooler & Damper

~ Back to Constitutional Medicine Introduction

~ Working our your Constitution





© 2011 R.J.Whelan Ltd